A Dijous 29 Maig 2008, Shawn (Red Mop) va escriure: > On Thursday 29 May 2008 02:56:56 am Dave Howorth wrote: > > Shawn (Red Mop) wrote: > > > This also suggests making your rsize/wsize smaller... > > > http://osdir.com/ml/nfs/2003-03/msg00119.html > > > > I think that's past its sell-by date :) AFAIK, current NFS uses TCP by > > default and the rsize and wsize are optimal as Leopold has them in most > > circumstances. So I'd do careful performance checking of any changes! > > > > But improving network performance definitely seems to be the first > > priority. > > Well, that puts me out of ideas. I'm not an nfs guru by any means. I > mainly just use it for /usr/portage/distfiles. > > How did the backup go last night?
Sorry for the delay. Today was not a good day... anyway, better, much better: Number of files: 1161747 Number of files transferred: 1777 Total file size: 132295386008 bytes Total transferred file size: 1925258471 bytes Literal data: 1925258471 bytes Matched data: 0 bytes File list size: 25969262 File list generation time: 1148.268 seconds File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds Total bytes sent: 1952512709 Total bytes received: 1009728 sent 1952512709 bytes received 1009728 bytes 72760.95 bytes/sec total size is 132295386008 speedup is 67.72 Now, I should think about create a binary of rsync for that box and then compare. Thanks to all for all, specially to Shawn (Red Mop) for the interest. When I got some news I promise that I will write to the list. Best regards, Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 PGP: 0xF944807E Catalonia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
