Me again, I did my first Backup using NFS also - because it is much faster than using rsync over ssh. The CPU of my synology (207+) is to slow for that. But all "new" backups are using rsync/ssh, because the changes are very small.
And as Dave already said: if the first backup has some faulty or missing entries - just ignore that and never user the first "init" for restoring files ;-) With best regards, Dirk Melchers /// IT/Software-Development /// -- NUREG GmbH /// Dorfäckerstraße 31 | 90427 Nürnberg | Germany Tel. +49-911-32002-256 | Fax +49-911-32002-299 Mobil +49-172-9354670 | www.nureg.de Nürnberg HRB 22653 | USt.ID DE 814 685 653 Geschäftsführer: Michael Schmidt, Stefan Boas Am 02.01.2013 um 09:16 schrieb Dirk Melchers: > Hello, > > I am using dirvish for backup of a Synology for about a week now. It is no > problem to use dirvish in the normal way. > > You have to activate the ssh server and the network backup service on the > synology, that starts the rsyncd. Then I created the ssh-keys for root on the > dirvish server and transfered the pub part to the synology for ssh to work > (.ssh/authorized_keys). Try to connect to the synology. > > After that, it is a normal dirvish client ;-) > > I also tried to use a rsyncd - module in rsyncd.conf, but the rsyncd on the > synology is somehow manipulated and it does not work. Google did only find > other people having the same problem, but no solution to it. I did not want > to install another rsync on the synology, so I stay using ssh. _______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
