Brian Padalino wrote:

> Rebuilding an entire FPGA image on the fly isn't in the cards just
> yet, though some high end Xilinx FPGAs do support "partial
> reconfigurability" which will allow a design to have a standardized IO
> interface and all the "guts" are reprogrammed without powering down
> the device.
> 
> This could allow, in theory, one "IO ring" to be made for the USRP and
> the user would fill in the "guts" with their signal processing
> application (eg: wideband TDMA, CDMA, narrowband FSK, etc).  As long
> as each of the guts had the same hooks to the outside, the FPGA can be
> put into a state of lockdown while being reprogrammed, and a reset can
> be applied to the guts once reprogrammed.

Not sure if USRP2 FPGA supports this or not.  Not a bad idea to floor
plan, get timing right, and lock down the non-DSP parts, and let the
user create an inner application with abstract ports.  But I'd be happy
with a compile-time logically equivalent code organization.  I think
Matt's already planning for it.

-- 
Johnathan Corgan
Corgan Enterprises LLC
http://corganenterprises.com


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to