Thank you for your reply Eric. I did print delta and delta.microseconds and guess what I did get this:
Receiver (0) = BABA0002 Requested RX Bitrate: 100k Probe Level 39 0:00:00.000327 [*This is from printing delta*] 327 [*This is from printing delta.microseconds*] Why do you think I should not get 309us? I am sorry if I don't get something fundamental here. Thanks again for helping me out :) On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Eric Blossom <e...@comsec.com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 02:05:12PM -0500, Bishal Thapa wrote: > > Hi, > > I have an interesting observation to share, and I want to see if > anybody > > can help me shed some light. When I measure time in python in the > following > > way: > > > > t1 = datetime.now() > > self.start() > > t2=datetime.now() > > diff = t2.microsecond - t1.microsecond > > print "Difference %d", diff > > > > I get very different time benchmarks..it goes from 309 microseconds > > (minimum) to all the way 1 second(max). Do you know why this thread > spawning > > is taking such a variety of time after flowgraph start()?? > > I seriously doubt it ever take 309us :-) > > If you subtract two datetimes you get a timedelta. > See the docs. > > t1 = datetime.now() > self.start() > t2=datetime.now() > delta = t2 - t1 > print delta > > Eric >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
