Ok, but it is not clear for me how to open a ticket in gr bug tracker...

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de> wrote:

>  Yes, please attach it to your ticket.
>
> Am 07.08.2013 14:28, schrieb Anton Komarov:
>
> Marcus, am i supposed to share e.g. 10 seconds of captured spectrum so you
> can play with it on your side?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Anton,
>> it is really hard to capture apco25 signals in Germany.
>> Could you really open a ticket, attach a few captured samples saved using
>> a file sink,
>> and the 3.6 and 3.7 flowgraphs; or provide some kind of test case with
>> GNU Radio Signal sources
>> that simulate a signal. Be sure to attach screenshots of your waterfall
>> plots.
>> It is really hard to guess what goes  wrong otherwise.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Marcus
>>
>> Am 07.08.2013 13:56, schrieb Anton Komarov:
>>
>> Ok, i've attached very simple grc chart
>> with slider you can change the frequency, two waterfalls shows spectrums
>> before and after xlating.
>> So i had test it in apco25 env and took apco signals as a reference. So
>> when i saw signal e.g. at 451.378 MHz and tuned to it i saw no signal after
>> xlating nevertheless it was the same time on waterfall before xlating.
>>
>>  You can test this chart with you radio environment.
>>
>>  Then i testing the same logic with gr 3.6 (code is not compatible i
>> have to redraw it..) and here it is! xlating worked like a charm.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Martin Braun (CEL) 
>> <martin.br...@kit.edu>wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:00:32PM +0400, Anton Komarov wrote:
>>> > Hi, made an attempt to test my python scripts with new 3.7.0 of GR
>>> >
>>> > and what i am seeing xlate fir filter is broken
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > previously xlate worked perfect with 3.6 version
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > tested with waterfalls and i see wrong xlating
>>> >
>>> > i think developers should pay attention to this issue
>>>
>>>  Hi Anton,
>>>
>>> can you please elaborate on this bug. Ideally, could you post an issue
>>> on our tracker: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/issues
>>>
>>> Specify what you configured, what the expected outcome was and what
>>> happened instead.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> MB
>>>
>>> --
>>> Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
>>> Communications Engineering Lab (CEL)
>>>
>>> Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun
>>> Research Associate
>>>
>>> Kaiserstraße 12
>>> Building 05.01
>>> 76131 Karlsruhe
>>>
>>> Phone: +49 721 608-43790
>>> Fax: +49 721 608-46071
>>> www.cel.kit.edu
>>>
>>>     KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and
>>> National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to