It's not just you, I noticed this too. This change broke gr-atsc ( but I
fixed that ).
The problem is on line 80 of
gr-filter/lib/freq_xlating_fir_filter_XXX_impl.cc.t: the 2 was not negative
in 3.6 but is now, i'm not sure why.

Andrew


On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Stephen Harrison
<msteveharri...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Is it just me or did the polarity of the frequency offset in
> freq_xlating_fir_filter get reversed between 3.6 and 3.7?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Anton Komarov <akoma...@nvisiongroup.ru>wrote:
>
>> Who can help me to open a ticket?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Anton Komarov 
>> <akoma...@nvisiongroup.ru>wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, but it is not clear for me how to open a ticket in gr bug tracker...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Yes, please attach it to your ticket.
>>>>
>>>> Am 07.08.2013 14:28, schrieb Anton Komarov:
>>>>
>>>> Marcus, am i supposed to share e.g. 10 seconds of captured spectrum so
>>>> you can play with it on your side?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Marcus Müller <mar...@hostalia.de>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi Anton,
>>>>> it is really hard to capture apco25 signals in Germany.
>>>>> Could you really open a ticket, attach a few captured samples saved
>>>>> using a file sink,
>>>>> and the 3.6 and 3.7 flowgraphs; or provide some kind of test case with
>>>>> GNU Radio Signal sources
>>>>> that simulate a signal. Be sure to attach screenshots of your
>>>>> waterfall plots.
>>>>> It is really hard to guess what goes  wrong otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.08.2013 13:56, schrieb Anton Komarov:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, i've attached very simple grc chart
>>>>> with slider you can change the frequency, two waterfalls shows
>>>>> spectrums before and after xlating.
>>>>> So i had test it in apco25 env and took apco signals as a reference.
>>>>> So when i saw signal e.g. at 451.378 MHz and tuned to it i saw no signal
>>>>> after xlating nevertheless it was the same time on waterfall before 
>>>>> xlating.
>>>>>
>>>>>  You can test this chart with you radio environment.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Then i testing the same logic with gr 3.6 (code is not compatible i
>>>>> have to redraw it..) and here it is! xlating worked like a charm.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Martin Braun (CEL) <
>>>>> martin.br...@kit.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:00:32PM +0400, Anton Komarov wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi, made an attempt to test my python scripts with new 3.7.0 of GR
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > and what i am seeing xlate fir filter is broken
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > previously xlate worked perfect with 3.6 version
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > tested with waterfalls and i see wrong xlating
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > i think developers should pay attention to this issue
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi Anton,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can you please elaborate on this bug. Ideally, could you post an issue
>>>>>> on our tracker: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/projects/gnuradio/issues
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specify what you configured, what the expected outcome was and what
>>>>>> happened instead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> MB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
>>>>>> Communications Engineering Lab (CEL)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dipl.-Ing. Martin Braun
>>>>>> Research Associate
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kaiserstraße 12
>>>>>> Building 05.01
>>>>>> 76131 Karlsruhe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Phone: +49 721 608-43790
>>>>>> Fax: +49 721 608-46071
>>>>>> www.cel.kit.edu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     KIT -- University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and
>>>>>> National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing 
>>>>> listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to