I'm sorry for something that I didn't write on the previous post. Comparing runtime and buffer, runtime and buffer have different number of blocks. In many cases of mine, buffer shows a fewer blocks than runtime.
My guess is that, it's because buffer of sink blocks don't have to be monitored. Is what I guess is correct? If so, this might be a problem when I want to monitor a certain block which has an optional output signature so that it is recognized as a sink block. Is there a way to monitor a such block? Regards, Jeon. 2015-08-06 19:31 GMT+09:00 Jeon <sjeon87+gnura...@gmail.com>: > I am looking into CPU and buffer usage of my OOT module via CtrlPort > Performance Monitor. > > I have two flow graphs, a transmitter and a receiver. > > I can see a quite reasonable performance measures on the receiver side: > > > > However, on the transmitter side, buffer usage shows very weird values: > > > > It says, the transmitter of my OOT module rarely uses buffer. But, i don't > think so, and actually it uses buffers! At least, I think encoders on the > transmitter should use buffers as much as decoders on the receiver does. > (Of course, it's not true that encoder and decoder require same > computational cost. But, what I mean is that such tiny value is ridiculous.) > > I've executed the transmitter flow graph several times again and again, > that number (1.52...e-5) never changes. > > My guess is, that number is a floating point representation of 1/(2^16). > And 2^16 is 64k. But I have no idea what it means. > > Can anyone give me a tiny hint of it? > > Regards > Jeon. >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
