Hi

In my "through-the-air" tests with a couple of B210s the FFT filters
presented much lower
FER in comparison to the FIR filters at the Rx side. According to [1], the
"FFT filters"
downsamples after filtering while FIR downsamples before filtering.

cheers

[1]
http://www.trondeau.com/blog/2014/2/27/to-use-or-not-to-use-fft-filters.html

On 15 December 2015 at 19:06, Saulo Queiroz <ssaulojo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Many thanks Bastian!
>
> I checked the loopback version and it seems to work very well.
>
> I'll check over-the-air and report here!
>
> On 15 December 2015 at 19:04, Bastian Bloessl <bloe...@ccs-labs.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I replaced the Frequency Xlating FFT filters with FIR filters, used the
>> Low-Pass Filter Taps block to generate taps (since I can’t get my head
>> around this notation), and removed the filter from the first conversion.
>>
>> Now, it seems to work. At least it receives frames. If you still have
>> problems I can send you the flow graph.
>>
>> Best,
>> Bastian
>>
>>
>> > On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:05, Saulo Queiroz <ssaulojo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Each stream has been shiffted with the xlating block.
>> > The intention is to "split" a 20 MHz wide analog channel into two of 10
>> MHz.
>> > Each 10 MHz channel transmit its own ofdm frame.
>> > I attached the flowgraph for more details.
>> >
>> > thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > On 15 December 2015 at 17:42, Martin Braun-2 [via GnuRadio] <[hidden
>> email]> wrote:
>> > tP indicates you're using corrupt tagged streams, maybe your add block
>> > is overlaying them? I'm also not entirely sure what you mean by
>> > 'simultaneous parallel transmissions'. Are they on different
>> > frequencies? Are you mixing them together in baseband?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Martin
>> >
>> >
>> > On 15.12.2015 04:10, Saulo Queiroz wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I'm trying to Tx a same tagged stream simultaneously through two
>> analog
>> > > orthogonal channels.
>> > >
>> > > The flow path of each stream copy is: resampling, adjust tag lenght
>> and
>> > > xlating FFT filter (with shifting). After this I take the output of
>> each
>> > > filter and put into and add block then to the USRP sink. I also do the
>> > > reverse process at the Rx side.
>> > > With some packets are successfuly receive but with so many losses. At
>> > > the Tx side I get many "tP". Any tip on how to set simultaneous
>> parallel
>> > > transmissions without this?
>> > >
>> > > I'm using gr-ieee80211 (thanks Bastian and team :) that has worked
>> > > nicely with the single channel scenario.
>> > >
>> > > thanks in advance
>> > >
>> > > BR
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Saulo Jorge bq
>> > > - "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
>> not
>> > > tried it."
>> > > Donald Knuth.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> > > [hidden email]
>> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> > [hidden email]
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >
>> >
>> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>> >
>> http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/Tag-preemption-USRP-sink-tp57286p57297.html
>> > To start a new topic under GnuRadio, email [hidden email]
>> > To unsubscribe from GnuRadio, click here.
>> > NAML
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Saulo Jorge bq
>> > - "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
>> tried it."
>> > Donald Knuth.
>> >
>> >  wifi_tx_rx_loopback.grc (134K) Download Attachment
>> >
>> > View this message in context: Re: Tag preemption USRP sink
>> > Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>> --
>> Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
>> Distributed Embedded Systems Group
>> University of Paderborn, Germany
>> http://www.ccs-labs.org/~bloessl/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Saulo Jorge bq
> - "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
> tried it."
> Donald Knuth.
>



-- 
Saulo Jorge bq
- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it."
Donald Knuth.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to