Hello, To WarMonkey: I know how to make OOT and it seems that you don't understand my question. To Gregory: That's a brilliant idea. I just need a counter and based on that just switch the branch in my flowgraph. I am going to try this. Thanks!
śr., 4 maj 2022 o 19:03 Gregory Warnes <g...@warnes.net> napisał(a): > How about configuring two parallel data flows, with a switch that diverts > from one to the other after N samples? > > — > Gregory R. Warnes, Ph.D. > (Sent from a mobile device, please excuse any typographical issues.) > > On May 4, 2022, at 11:32 AM, Marcin Puchlik via GNU Radio, the Free & > Open-Source Toolkit for Software Radio <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > As far as I know, the "Head" block finishes the operation of a flowgraph > which I don't want to do. What OOT has to do? Any details? > > > śr., 4 maj 2022 o 17:21 WarMonkey <luoshumym...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > >> use "Head" N samples, or create your own OOT module. >> >> Marcin Puchlik via GNU Radio, the Free & Open-Source Toolkit for Software >> Radio <discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org> 于2022年5月4日周三 22:11写道： >> >>> Hello Everyone, >>> I want to reconfigure my flowgraph after receiving N samples. I am >>> following this example: >>> https://www.gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen-3.7.4/index.html#reconfigure >>> Instead of using *sleep(0.1) *I want my flowgraph to lock after >>> consumption of N samples. Then I want to rearrange the flowgraph blocks. Do >>> you have any idea how to do this? >>> My guess is that I can use *Performance Counters *like *nproduced *for >>> the first block in my flowgraph and base on that, call *lock() *function >>> on my *top_block()*. What do you think? >>> Cheers >>> Marcin >>> >>> >>>
