-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-11-18 21:36:13 +0800 Markus Hitter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am 18.11.2005 um 09:30 schrieb Chris B. Vetter:
I guess this is more of a general question, but why not focus on a
more 'original' clone and base it on Darwin?
Because there's no Darwin release?
There's Darwin 7.2.1, over a year old and not supporting current
Apple
hardware. Selected hardware on i386, only.
There's Darwin 8.0.1, not rebuildable from public sources and
requiring SSE2
extensions on i386. Additionaly, it's known to be neither stable nor
reliable.
That said, there's an upcoming Darwin 8.x release expected. After
months of
work, the small Darwin community finally seems to manage a rebuild
from
sources Apple released as "open".
Markus
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/
Does anybody know the difference between darwin/xnu and mach3 or
mach4? Im very tempted to take another crack at mach4.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail
iD8DBQFDfes8yihxuQOYt8wRAo62AJ0aZPr+Xw8WBNylovIFkAiHoPC3PACfXsrw
e/71J9etWKqSrR4FdWFDb78=
=nXUX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
