This is something that has been discussed and mulled over. The problem
comes when we look at accreditation - transfering to OpenSRS.net shows the
registrant that they are moving from one registrar to another. Having a
different URL show up would be difficult to support...
Also is the technical implications - since this is a secure site, there'd
have to be a secure certificate purchased and installed for each RSP that
was interested in utilizing this setup. Another approach would be to have
something like this:
http://www.transfers-r-us.com/?rsp_id=xxxx - where rsp_id would signify who
YOU are, and have your custom logo (etc) show up. Of course, transfers-r-us
(or whatever...) would still show up with OpenSRS information (etc) in the
whois....
Charles Daminato
Product Manager (ccTLDs)
Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Parag Mehta
> Sent: January 30, 2001 2:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: renewals -- am I missing something?
>
>
> Hi
>
> also the transfer domain mail contains the opensrs from address. even that
> needs a customisation too.. and if possible the url for the
> confirmation of
> the transfer page should also be that of the rsp maybe in some way like :
>
> transfers.rsp.com IN A rrn-1.opensrs.net.
>
> where the page is displayed with the trasnfer agreement etc.
>
> regards,
>
> parag mehta
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Engelhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 11:57 PM
> Subject: Re: renewals -- am I missing something?
>
>
> REPOST -- my message must have gotten lost the first time...
>
>
> What I don't understand is why opensrs is forcing us to invent a whole new
> system.
>
> When I did my first renewal today, I fully expected it to be
> just like any
> other 'order' with the same approval tools and using the same
> interface for
> validating credit cards.
>
> We have a good system in place that processes orders and that I have built
> software around.
>
> Now it looks like we have to start from scratch for renewals. And with a
> different model from opensrs.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Mark Engelhardt
> ++++ It is easy to tell the pioneers: they have arrows in their
> backs. +++
>
>
>
> on 1/26/01 4:16 PM, John Payne at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:40:32AM -0800, Bill Gerrard wrote:
> >>>>> I found it!) and renewal.cgi, and both allow people to renew
> >>> their domains
> >>>>> and mark as auto-renew *without any approval process*.
> >>>> This cannot be.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tell me this is not true!
> >>
> >> But it is... It sounds like someone hasn't been following the
> discussions
> >> here or reading the announcements sent by opensrs.... :)
> >
> > I don't get chance to follow all the discussions (ok, should've checked
> the
> > archive) - but I do read all announcements from opensrs, and didn't see
> > anything about renewals apart from announcing their availability in the
> latest
> > client code.
>
