On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Christopher Masto wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 10:30:39AM -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> > The only problem here is that I can't find moo using it. Where are the
> > dot.moo nameservers?
>
> I think you should get Tucows' permission before listing .moo with
> such a "service". If I were them, I wouldn't want the mock domain set
> up to demonstrate OpenXRS to be lumped in with a bunch of crackpots
> who think that they're running operational TLDs. It gives the
> impression that Tucows supports the political positions of these other
> people, which I highly doubt is the case.
This is all so irrelevant. First of all tucows listing of dot.moo will
probably happen on the alternates - simply put if it works in accordance
with RFC - it's listed.
As for permission - namespace requires no permission - it is controlled by
the end user and if the end user wants it - they get it. That sort of
thing may evade you - but we call it customer service. Something which
seems a bit out of style these days. That's why ICANN is falling
apart. People don't like ICANN and if given an opportunity to switch -
they switch.
Maybe I should present this in simpler terms for you. Think of namespace
as a service. You can get you ol flat rate service via the United States
Government servers (ICANN) and see a limited namespace. Or you can
upgrade to unlimited namespace at no cost.
Your other remarks are very irrelevant. I say only this - those who can
do - and those who can't attend ICANN meetings.
cheers ;-)
Joe Baptista
http://www.dot.god/
dot.GOD Hostmaster
+1 (805) 753-8697
