But TUCOWS still got paid for the service.....!!!! (Very important) So I think it's not that bad to the domain to the RSP.... I think what you are doing right now is: Selling lewd magazine subscription, let the customer pay and then you don't deliver..... (it's far away from what we are doing, but I did want to re-use your example) Cheers Marc Charles Daminato wrote: > You're not purchasing a tangible object here - domains are services. That > makes things a little different. > > Charles Daminato > TUCOWS Product Manager (ccTLDs) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Derek J. Balling wrote: > > > At 11:16 PM -0500 12/7/00, Ross Wm. Rader wrote: > > >This has been hashed out a million times on this list - the issue is that > > >the RSP is *not* the registrant. Tucows cannot assign ownership of a domain > > >at will under any circumstances. It's a crappy reality, but reality > > >nonetheless. > > > > But just like a car that you sell, but have to repossess (... and have the > > RIGHT to repossess) when payment doesn't come through, domain sellers need > > the ability to repossess what has not been paid for. If this means that SRS > > needs to put such in the terms/agreement, so that the buyer acknowledges > > the right-of-repossess, then let's push on and make that happen. > > > > D > > > >
begin:vcard n:Storck;Marc tel;fax:+352 2629 5599 tel;work:+352 2629 5566 x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:I-Bone Networks adr:;;1, rue du Fort Elisabeth;Luxembourg;;1463;Luxembourg version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] fn:Marc Storck end:vcard
