Scott Schiller, VP of domainalchemy.com, wrote:
>>So far, SnapNames is working with six registrars: Tucows; BulkRegister;
>>eNom; Dotster; NetNames; and >NamesDirect.
not sure if Tucows is in good company here
or if they moved to hastily:
At 11:14 Uhr -0500 28.12.2000, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:
>From: "Karl Auerbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Are any of the data subjects (i.e. the contacts associated with the
>> domain name) informed of the possibility or actuality of this transfer of
>> information?
>
>Of course not, Karl. The whole point is to get the registrars
>to tell SnapNames that a name is expiring,
>while not alerting the domain name registrant that it is expiring.
>
>What SnapNames is doing is to provide a financial inducement
>for registrars to provide SnapNames with information to be used
>contrary to the interests of the domain name registrants.
>Which, in any other field of endeavor, would put the
>registrars in a curious position..
is it still possible for OpenSRS to sever relations with SnapNames ?
good reputation and trust is everything in the domains business.
let's not taint our common service with dubious activities
of businesses hiding behind NDAs for every bit of vital information.
kind regards philippe, http://InternetRoot.com/
