I would add that at this time, the only operational relationship we have
with them is that they sell names through us.
sA
At 11:57 PM 1/4/01 -0500, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
>Jeff,
>
>For a definitive answer to this question, please refer to the massive thread
>in the archives.
>
>And if you don't, let me reiterate one last time. We have not decided on a
>specific course of action as it relates to SnapNames, but we are certainly
>listening to the concerns, implicit or otherwise, presented on this list and
>will take it into account when and if we move forward.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-rwr
>
>
>
>Ross Wm. Rader
>Director, Innovation & Research
>Tucows Inc.
>t. 416.538.5492
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jeff K.V. Bhavnanie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 11:36 PM
>Subject: [Fwd: SnapNames launching]
>
>
> > My question to this situation is:
> >
> > Is OpenSRS going to give SnapNames priority access to the SRS when
> > it comes to registering names by providing a separate server on OpenSRS
> > end?
> >
> > Jeff.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:
> > >
> > > <
> > > < Thursday, January 04, 2001, 11:29:57 AM, ecs wrote:
> > > <
> > > < > So does this mean that OpenSRS will make expired names available to
> > > < > SnapNames before they make them available to the RSP's?
> > > <
> > > < Or modifications to domain data available to SnapNames in a fashion
> > > < other than mandated by ICANN rules or otherwise already available
>(via
> > > < whois mining, etc)?
> > >
> > > Gentlemen - for the last time - there is *no* conspiracy. As far as our
> > > current presence on their site, they signed up as an RSP.
> > >
> > > If and when we have anything further to announce, we will. In the
>meantime,
> > > your comments and concerns have been heard and will most certainly be
>taken
> > > into account.
> > >
> > > -rwr
Scott Allan
Director OpenSRS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
