On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tiger Technologies wrote:

> At 4/4/01 10:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >I think you're confusing primary/secondary with master/slave.
> >Primary/secondary servers are visible right in whois.
> 
> .... but are meaningless terms, because the underlying resolver knows 
> nothing about the WHOIS info

Yes.

> The terms "primary" and "secondary" are 
> misleading and should really no longer be used.

Then why does our "primary" nameserver get 5-10 times as many requests
from the outside as our "secondary"?

Cliff


Reply via email to