Saturday, January 05, 2002, 3:30:17 PM, you wrote:

RLM> actually going to expire. Why wouldn't there still be 200 checks a second
RLM> for the remaining 1,000 names? There's no reason I can see that a single 
RLM> domain couldn't get 200 checks a second; for any reasonably valuable 
RLM> domain name, there are least 200 people worldwide who have the ability 
RLM> and desire to do one lookup a second or more on it.

You will still see a load during the drop window.  Registrars will use
their connections to get the names that their customers desire, but the
load will be much less than it is now.  The reason it will be lower is
that they will stop checking once the determine that the name has been
given to someone else.

For example, let's say that everyone *thinks* that coolname.com is
going to drop within the next 3 days. So they fire up their
connections and they each pound the registry with 100 check or add
commands a second for the entire "drop window" (which is can be around
2 hours -- not the 15 minutes verisign says). Now, if they get the
expiration date when they do a check or add, they can cease hammering
for that name. Let's say the name drops 5 minutes into the drop
window, you have just saved 100 checks per second * 1hour 45 minutes
of checks. So instead of doing 720,000 checks you do 30,000.  And
since the day of the drop is posted, instead of doing this for 3 days
(2.1 million checks), you do it only on the day it is dropped and only
until it is snapped up, not one second more.  Also, the above scenario
is only for 1 registrar, multiply that by the number of registrars
that are currently attempting to get the dropped names.  And I know
some registrars are doing in excess of 100 checks per second.

So yes, there will be a load on the registry, but it will be much less
severe, and much more efficient, and even, dare I say, more fair.

The reason it adds a bit of fairness is that the guy that *got*
coolname.com knows he should stop trying to get it, no one else knows
that. So now he can go on to try and get almostcoolname.com while all
the other poor slobs are still wasting their time in a vain attempt to
secure coolname.com

regards,
-joe

Reply via email to