At 1/5/02 4:32 PM, Harold Whiting wrote: >I would strongly suggest that you actually find out the facts and realities >before you post "assumptions" and "guesses" and then proceed to build an >argument based on a foundation of nonsense. Your numbers are complete >guesses, rendering any analysis flawed.
They weren't my numbers. I was following up on a post that suggested those numbers. But whether the actual numbers are half or ten times those numbers, my point (which is that demand is virtually infinite) is still completely valid, because "virtually inifinite" is bigger than whatever the actual number of peak registry connections available is ever going to be. >Besides, with just the one extra response code, this would all be a moot >point. Yes, it really IS that simple. No, it is not. I suspect that would not make any difference. I'll say it one more time: the entire problem is that demand is virtually infinite. It will remain virtually infinite even if people are trying to get only a single name. -- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies
