WebWiz wrote: > > I'm using tinydns, which is one of about half a dozen tools > in the djbdns quivver. Most commonly, you'd run tinydns > and dnscache (on separate machines) to provide equivalent > functionality to BIND (which combines the name server and > resolver functionality into a single server). The split, > apparently, was done for security and performance reasons.
I had better clarify my post here... I thought someone was referring to another product called TinyDNS (as opposed to the one in the djbdns package)... I wasn't thinking straight at the time, sorry! -kb -- Kris Benson ABC Communications +1 (250)612-5270 x204 +1 (888)235-1174 x204
