How can Tucows policy be to advocate having a reseller do something that could potentially jeopardize the customer's domain, and something that is about to become illegal? Who, besides the reseller could determine that it was the reseller and not the registrant that provided the false information. And what difference would it make from a legal standpoint?
My vague recollection of the policy that I haven't looked at for a year is that a reseller can enter their own information in place of the registrant's as long as the registrant agrees to this displacement (ie - via an agency agreement). When handled properly, the info isn't false, its just not leading directly to the registrant's front door...
-- Regards,
-rwr
"In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one indispensable condition for social progress."
- Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
