How can Tucows policy be to advocate having a reseller do something that could potentially jeopardize the customer's domain, and something that is about to become illegal? Who, besides the reseller could determine that it was the reseller and not the registrant that provided the false information. And what difference would it make from a legal standpoint?
There's is a difference between anonymizing and providing false information.
We anonymize for our clients who request it by supplying *our* information. As long as we can contact the client in question, it's correct contact information for them, so no law or rule is broken.
