Jerry Feldman wrote:
On 12/04/2011 05:14 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Ben Eisenbraun wrote:
My understanding of the spat between Curtatone and Verizon is that
it stems
from his opposition to Verizon's desire to negotiate video
franchises on the
state and not city level. Verizon keeps pushing legislation on this
issue,
e.g:
Verizon keeps pushing this legislation because Comcast continues to
abuse the existing legislation to maintain its monopolies in much of
the Commonwealth. Can't have it both ways, guys.
Regarding the "wholly owned subsidiary" comment, allow me to explain
the concept of hyperbole:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole
Both are large regulated monopolies. Wait until we get Comcast
Wireless :-)
http://www.comcast.com/About/PressRelease/PressReleaseDetail.ashx?PRID=887
I wonder how the recent deal with SpectrumCo and Verizon will affect the
above, which the 3G side is on Sprint's network (4G on Clearwire)?
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
