> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey....@blu.org] On > Behalf Of Eric Chadbourne > > Hi Ed, > > I can understand your point on using OS X as the host OS but that is more of a > limitation of OS X and not the other operating systems.
Agreed. But that's a philosophical point, which I've found, I never get any traction with. I can bitch and gripe all I want about Apple's policies and how their products are designed to benefit *them* with consumer lock-in, etc etc blah blah. Nobody's listening. > How do you like vmware? I’ve been using virtualbox for years but I heard > recently there’s only one dev really maintaining it. Too big a project for > that. > I wonder if it will be discontinued soon? Virtualbox is really good for a free product. But if you use it all day every day, as a professional, then there's no question about it, vmware fusion and parallels are better. More features, better reliability, better performance. Fusion and Parallels are each better in their own ways - ultimately it's a wash between the two. They're both fine. Being a techy person, I prefer the vmware style over the parallels style. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
