Because the recruiter who submitted my resume is entitled to an employer
paid fee of anywhere from 7% to 30% or more of my starting salary.
Employers do not want to be in a position where they can be sued by the
recruiter(s) that don't get their fee, but believe they are entitled to
it because they also submitted my resume.
Or so the story goes ...
Jerry Natowitz
===> j.natowitz (at) rcn.com
On 06/03/15 11:41, Mike Small wrote:
Jerry Natowitz <[email protected]> writes:
A friend has suggested that I try hired.com to find a new position. I
looked into it and wondered how well I could control the process of
submitting my resume to prevent what I have always heard is the kiss
of death: two or more recruiters submitting your resume to the same
client.
I don't understand. Why does this matter (so much)? Someone won't hire
you because they saw your résumé come at them from two sources?
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
