On March 28, 2017, Dan Ritter wrote: >Why are they charging you $100/month for [fiber]? They should have >an obligation to replace your copper with fiber at the same >cost.
Sorry for not being clear -- that's the same cost as the copper. AT&T is expensive for a landline. So my option #1 is to keep paying the same cost as now. But the only reason I was willing to fork over $100/month was because it was copper and stayed up in power outages. Now that reason is gone, so it makes sense to switch to a lower-cost provider. -- Dan Barrett dbarr...@blazemonger.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
