Cor Nouws wrote: > Also I think QA@ is a good thing. > I think I fundamentally disagree on this one - the interface between QA and Dev is incredibly huge, I'd even venture the proposition that ideally there's no difference (in core competencies - maybe there is one in attitude ;)) - at any rate, the chasm between the OpenOffice project's QA and Dev teams is something I *do not* want to transplant into our new project.
Ideally, I want QA folks to take notice if the Devs start debating details of specific features, and conversely, I want Devs to take notice of QA talking about specific "problem areas" in the product. Cheers, -- Thorsten -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
