Hi, I'm a LO user and that's my opinion about the discussion:

I'm still using LO beta 1 because of its download size.
When I saw the size of package beta 2 and 3, I gave up.

I thought that each beta release I need to download ~300 MB... It's better
for me download this on the stable version.

*Sorry for my english. I'm a good reader, but not a good writer.

[]s,
Daniel Bessa
--
P: Por que esta mensagem é tão curta?
R: http://3frases.efetividade.net


On 30 November 2010 16:16, Kevin Vermeer <reemrevni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Bandwidth is not the only reason for a smaller installer, and I'm not even
> sure it's a significant one.  Users with dial-up internet, slow DSL
> connections, or bandwidth caps are used to long, long downloads.  The
> difference between 3 minutes and 10 minutes might be significant to those
> of
> us with fast connections, but the difference between 3 hours and 10 hours
> is
> not as important.  It will just be another overnight download, the same as
> every other large installer that they've worked with.
>
> However, let's not forget that many users also have monthly download caps,
> often just a few gigabytes.  Downloading the current LibreOffice installer
> could be 10% of their monthly internet use, regardless of how long it
> takes.  The need for a smaller installer still stands.
>
> Perhaps the installer could be replaced by a small configuration
> application, which would allow the user to select the components they wish
> to install, and would then download the selected components?  Ideally,
> re-running this configuration app later would allow the user to add
> language
> packs, plugins, and modules like Draw, Base, or Math which had been left
> out
> the first time around (assuming this code rewrite happens).  This would
> simplify the configuration process (avoiding user confusion, they'd know
> what they selected in this step), would decrease server bandwidth (many
> users would choose not to download some parts of the application), and
> reduce the time before a user experiences LibreOffice - Instead of waiting
> for their browser to finish the download, they'd be interacting with the
> LibreOffice installer right away.
> --
> Kevin Vermeer
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Robert Derman <
> robert.der...@pressenter.com
> > wrote:
>
> > With all the discussion of the size of the download package and the
> > difficulty of including things like manuals I suddenly realized that
> perhaps
> > we are going about this thing entirely wrong!  Perhaps what we should do
> is
> > offer a CHOICE of several download packages, not just one take it or
> leave
> > it package.
> >
> >  A basic download package with just the core LO Office Suite, like what
> we
> > have had up to now, and as an alternative, a Complete package including
> > users manual(s), templates, extensions, clip art, fonts, anything else
> that
> > should be in a complete package.  Perhaps we could even offer a Writer
> Only
> > package without Calc, Draw, Impress, Base, or Math, and with just a BRIEF
> > users manual for Writer.  I suspect that there may be many home users
> that
> > just want a word processor and aren't at all interested in the rest of
> the
> > suite.
> >
> >
> > Different users have very different internet connections, some are still
> > dial up.  Some are DSL, and some are Cable and have huge bandwidth.
> > Offering only a One-Size-Fits-All package may no longer be the best idea.
> >  --
> > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org>
> <discuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org<discuss%252bh...@documentfoundation.org>
> >
> > Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org<discuss%2bh...@documentfoundation.org>
> Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
>
>


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to