Michael, Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:28:58 +0930, Michael Wheatland <mich...@wheatland.com.au> a écrit :
> On 03/01/2011 8:46 PM, "Charles-H. Schulz" < > charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:58:18 -0000, > > Zaphod Feeblejocks <zapho...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > On 3 Jan 2011 at 17:29, Michael Wheatland wrote: > > > > > > > > Could addons be clearly signposted on the main page? > > > > > > > > > > Could first-time users be taken to the addons page, so they > > > > > know functionality can be extended? > > > > > > > > > > Could addons be clearly posted in the menus? > > > > > > > > > > Could the frequency of downloading addons be counted and a > > > > > pack of the most popular ones be compiled? Could the > > > > > most-frequent-addons pack even be an optional extra included > > > > > with the download? > > > > > > > > Zaphod, > > > > I have some good news for you. The website team is already > > > > tackling this with the Drupal implementation. > > > > > > > > In case you are not aware the current site at libreoffice.org is > > > > earmarked for an upgrade (as per the steering committee advice). > > > > The website team has been busy building the site over at a > > > > temporary domain www.libreofficeaustralia.org > > > > > > Great work! > > > > While I do thank Michael for its great work I believe there's a > > slight misunderstanding here: Michael's own exploratory work might > > be used one day for the LibreOffice website, but it is at this > > stage not considered for an "upgrade". > > > > best, > > Charles. > > > > > > > > zf > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Charles-H. Schulz > > Membre du Comité exécutif > > The Document Foundation. > > Charles, > Far from being 'my' exploration work, the majority of the website > team has contributed towards this project after the Steering > Committee discussion and the outcome of which, I am paraphrasing, to > implement the Silverstripe CMS on Drupal.org with a view to go with > Drupal long term. "to implement the Silverstripe CMS on Drupal.org" does not seem to mean anything to me. "With a view to go with Drupal" was rather: with the possible option of Drupal in the long term. > > The progress made by many of the contributing members has been > fantastic, and although I have been the most vocal of the website > development team regarding the implementation of a community building > and tooling site there are many other people who have done fantastic > work. > > I will be applying to the Steering Committee soon to set a target > date for implementation in order to focus the website team on a > tangible goal. Well there will be no target, I'm afraid. > > There does seem to be a little bit of misinformation out there > regarding this SC decision, but it is quite clear if you listen to > the decision outcome statement on the recording of the SC meeting. > > I am sure this will be clarified when the website team applies for a > further decision on implementation. "a little bit of misinformation", Michael, is perhaps your enthusiasm leading to understand things the way you would like them to be :-). At this stage, I don't believe we have any clear plans to move to Drupal; there seems indeed to have been some early misunderstanding, but if you wish the SC will clarify its position (again) . But given that I'm a member of the said SC, it might be useful to you to take my words into account. Best, Charles. > > Michael Wheatland > -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
