Jonathan, I believe there are some specific legal issues that are related to FOSS licences, but we do need to investigate some more (help is welcome).
Best, Charles. Le Fri, 07 Jan 2011 10:41:52 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina <eagles051...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Would we do something with LO, or would there be GPL licensing issues? > > On 01/07/2011 10:04 AM, Uwe Altmann wrote: > > Am 07.01.11 04:57, schrieb todd rme: > > > >> - It is not packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging > >> technologies included in Xcode – No third party installers are > >> allowed (I thought this was a major goal of LibO) > > It /is/ "packaged and submitted using Apple’s packaging > > technologies" as far as the Mac Version of OOo is concerned - it's > > a *.dmg file containing an *.app folder, which his a common way of > > installing programs on a Mac. > > > > NeoOffice is listed since years in the download area of apple.com so > > this can not be that problematic. > > -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
