Hi Jim,
Am 08.06.2011 18:25, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
It's possible, sure, but if the ASF were to do this, then I
would expect that they/we would spent quite a bit of time
determining the "best" place for it... Not saying that it's
not TDF, but who knows... Not a slam against TDF at all,
just an honest statement that we don't know where it would
go.
I see no problem in that statement, as it is just what you say: honest.
But a mail before you wrote:
... There are people who see TDF's resistance to working with the ASF ...
I do not see, that this resistance really exists for two reasons:
1st
It is up to the individuals to bring a project forward, so the TDF as
abstract entity would do very abstract work only. If you have a look at
the recent discussions, you may notice that many TDF members already
gave a lot of input and helped Apache to make a good decision. I
personally would consider this as "working together" (at least as a
first step).
2nd
I hope I'm allowed to be as honest as you are. I don't feel that ASF is
"the best place" for the OOo trademark and source code. But I still
consider Apache as "a good place" - so imho we are at a quite even level
(unless you want to tell that TDF would be a really "bad" place for the
OOo assets ;) ).
regards,
André
(PS.: same rule here as at the Apache lists: I'm speaking as individual
- not as "TDF")
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
