On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 08:46 -0700, Keith Curtis wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:08 AM, BRM <bm_witn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > And TDF/LO is the real fork in this case. In your opinion it would have > > been a > > necessary fork, but it is the fork nonetheless. Any argument otherwise is > > revisionist history. > > > > LO was a fork, but that was the for many months ago.
Yes and the transfer of OpenOffice.org to Apache is just that, a transfer. I'd add only one other comment - One doesn't have to like something in order to accept or acknowledge it. Best wishes, Drew Jensen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
