Hi Christian
Christian Lohmaier (klammer) wrote > Only insofar that Portable versions are hosten on our mirror > infrastructure and are advertized/available on our download pages. > > They are not produced by TDF itself. Thanks. That is what I thought. Christian Lohmaier (klammer) wrote >> Shouldn't there be an equivalent Portable version for each stable >> release? > > Portable releases always come a little after the original release, but > if there is one, it is added... My question is related to a problem I run into today while opening an odt created in 3.5.x and that won't open in 3.6.2.1 There is no Portable version of 3.5.6 only of 3.5.5 (released in July 12th) However version 3.6.1 is already available (released in Sept 11th) This leads me to think that the guys creating the Portable version are possibly going to ignore version 3.5.7 (which is currently in rc1) in the same way that they never released version 3.4.6 Of course any user can update the Portable install manually but it is not a simple trivial task. I think that for testing and because of regressions it would be good that the Portable version would match all stable versions of each branch. Better yet, it would be good if the last version of each branch was kept available at the LO download site. Just a suggestion for TDF to consider. Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-Portable-tp4009436p4009474.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted