Hi, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:06:39AM +0200, alonso wrote: > > Le 28 avr. 2014 à 20:46, David Tardon <[email protected]> a écrit : > Potential ideas: > . Is it better if we make all interface inherit from a basic > generic interface ?
I am not sure what would be the advantage of that... Just to decrease the amount of duplication among the interfaces? > . If the interface for presentation need also chart, do we need > to add a RVNGChartInterface and some > mechanism to obtain access to this interface in > RVNGPresentation/SpreadsheetInterface That is not how we have done this so far--we have always added the callbacks to all interfaces that need them. I can imagine having a single function, e.g., createChartInterface(), that would return an instance of a hypothetic RVNGChartInterface. It might even be preferable. But it seems weird to do that only for charts. We have lots of other duplication in the interfaces. D. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentliberation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
