Le 15 mai 2014 à 16:54, David Tardon <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
Hello,
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:06:39AM +0200, alonso wrote:
>>
>> Le 28 avr. 2014 à 20:46, David Tardon <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> Potential ideas:
>> . Is it better if we make all interface inherit from a basic
>> generic interface ?
>
> I am not sure what would be the advantage of that... Just to decrease
> the amount of duplication among the interfaces?
This will allow to decrease a lot the duplication of code among the
generator...
>
>> . If the interface for presentation need also chart, do we need
>> to add a RVNGChartInterface and some
>> mechanism to obtain access to this interface in
>> RVNGPresentation/SpreadsheetInterface
>
> That is not how we have done this so far--we have always added the
> callbacks to all interfaces that need them. I can imagine having a
> single function, e.g., createChartInterface(), that would return an
> instance of a hypothetic RVNGChartInterface. It might even be
> preferable.
At least in ods, chart are special because we need to attach them to
the main document's spreadsheet.
This seems possible in flat ods document but I do not success to do that in
classic ods document =>
I end creating automatically a true embedded chart in "Object */*"….
Yes, I was also thinking of integrated documents where we may need to
create some embedded
graphic/spreadsheet/...
> But it seems weird to do that only for charts. We have lots
> of other duplication in the interfaces.
Ok.
>
> D.
--
Amicalement,
Laurent
ps: I am modifying libmwaw to make it compile by adding the new virtual
function and we need to define
OdfGenerator::drawConnector in OdfGenerator.cxx , ...
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentliberation.org/www/discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
