Good points, Kevin, and awesome quote, Peter. Scalia brings up a lot of
those points, especially related to obscenity. I definitely encourage you
all to read the opinion—Scalia writes excellently and has a sharp bite here
and there.

**-Adi



On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Peter Olson <[email protected]> wrote:

> At 6:14 PM -0700 6/27/11, Kevin Driscoll wrote:
>
>  One reason I opposed the CA law is that it singles out "video games"
>> without providing a justification for doing so. Have experimental
>>
>
>
>  Another fascinating dimension of this case is that it highlights the
>> bizarre historical distinction between violence and sex. Obscenity
>> (which is restricted) traditionally includes sex but not violence.
>>
>
>
>  Kevin
>>
>
> One of my favorite observations about this is in the intro scene in the
> move "High Fidelity" where Rob/John Cusack says:
>
> "What came first, the music or the misery? People worry about kids playing
> with guns, or watching violent videos, that some sort of culture of violence
> will take them over. Nobody worries about kids listening to thousands,
> literally thousands of songs about heartbreak, rejection, pain, misery and
> loss. Did I listen to pop music because I was miserable? Or was I miserable
> because I listened to pop music?"
>
> peter
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freeculture.org/**mailman/listinfo/discuss<http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> FAQ: 
> http://wiki.freeculture.org/**Fc-discuss<http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to