On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Chris Sakkas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, another common scenario is for the gratis version to be FLO > but the for a cost version to combine FLO and non-FLO content. For example, > the print version of Dungeon World combines text under CC Attribution with > unlicensed images. I wouldn't say this is unfortunate; it is sometimes the best available outcome. If you want to produce art or text that requires images or other material that you must pay to license, then the most-complete version of that work cannot be FLO. Each copy you distribute should cost the reader at least what it marginally costs you to license that material for redistribution. Nevertheless a thoughtful author will in this case also release a FLO version containing only the FLO material, to improve access and simplify reuse. SJ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
