A CAR IN EVERY GARAGE, FAST INTERNET ON EVERY PC
[SOURCE: WebProNews, AUTHOR: Jason Lee Miller]
At a hearing of the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Chairman 
John Kerry (D-MA) called on the Bush administration to make a commitment to 
making high-speed Internet access more widely available to small businesses and 
all Americans. This involves, he said, changes in regulations to ensure 
universal broadband access and adequate competition in the marketplace. "To 
compete and win in the new global economy, we need a national broadband 
strategy that encourages competition and expands access," said Sen Kerry. 
"Previous generations put a toaster in every home and a car in every driveway 
as signs of economic progress-it's time we do the same with high speed Internet 
access." At the same hearing, Federal Communications Commission Commissioner 
Jonathan Adelstein echoed Sen. Kerry's call for opening up broadband 
competition. "Only rational competition policies can ensure that the U.S. 
broadband market does not devolve into a stagnant duopoly, which is a serious 
concern given that cable and DSL providers now control approximately 96 percent 
of the residential broadband market." FCC Commissioner Michael Copps was 
critical of the FCC still calling 200 kilobits per second 'broadband' and 
assuming that if one person in a ZIP code has broadband access, everyone else 
does as well. "This is 2007, not 1997. We need a more credible definition of 
speed and more granular measures of deployment, as well as to start gathering 
data on price and the experience of other nations," Commissioner Copps said.
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/09/26/a-car-in-every-garage-fast-internet-on-every-pc
* Commissioner Copps before Senate Committee on Small Business
America's lack of a broadband strategy is imposing huge costs on small 
businesses all across the land. Our lackluster broadband performance is a huge 
barrier to, and tax upon, innovation and entrepreneurship.  Businesses 
everywhere are increasingly reliant on broadband Internet access; it has become 
as essential as electricity, running water or phone service.  Yet many small 
businesses in rural America cannot get an Internet connection at all.  Even 
where they can, they typically pay too much for service that is too slow.  The 
story isn't all that much better in the nation's metropolitan areas.  Prices 
are high for service that is, by international standards, uncompetitive. The 
Internet should be the great equalizer-leveling the playing field between urban 
and rural; large and small; domestic and global businesses.  The broadband 
system we have today makes a mockery of this great promise and instead creates 
competitive disparities. Part of our problem is reliance upon duopoly and 
oligopoly where we should be enjoying vigorous carrier and network competition. 
 How do we turn things around?  Let's start with a comprehensive national 
strategy.  We need a strong statement, combined with serious commitment from 
the very top-not just a campaign promise-that broadband is a national priority. 
 We need to make sure all the departments of government are cooperating to 
encourage broadband deployment, using financial tools such as matching grants 
and tax incentives.  Second we need to start cataloging and benefiting from all 
the innovation and experimentation that's occurring outside of Washington D.C.  
Third, there is enormous room to improve our competitive telecommunications 
policies.  Fourth, we need to commit to supporting broadband with the Universal 
Service Fund.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276881A1.doc
* Commissioner Adelstein before Senate Committee on Small Business
For a long time, the U.S. was the undisputed world leader in communications 
technology. Yet, in recent years, we have tumbled from that historic position. 
Each year, we slip further down the regular rankings of broadband penetration. 
While some have questioned the international broadband penetration rankings, 
the fact is the U.S. has dropped year-after-year. This downward trend and the 
lack of broadband value illustrate the sobering point that when it comes to 
giving our citizens affordable access to state-of the-art communications, the 
U.S. has fallen behind its global competitors. There is no doubt about the 
evidence that citizens of other countries are getting a much greater broadband 
value in the form of more megabits for less money. A true broadband strategy 
should incorporate benchmarks, deployment timetables, and measurable thresholds 
to gauge our progress. We need to set ambitious goals and shoot for affordable, 
truly high-bandwidth broadband. We should start by updating our current anemic 
definition of high-speed of just 200 kbps in one direction to something more 
akin to what consumers receive in countries with which we compete, speeds that 
are magnitudes higher than our current definitions.
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-276886A1.pdf


---------------------------------------------------------------
             WWWhatsup NYC
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------- 

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.isoc-ny.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to