I guess it's each to their own :) and that's what keeps things interesting!
Personally, any external JS files I use I like to consider libraries of code that I can include without having to think about... and I don't really want them doing stuff triggered by events (of any kind) unless I first set those events up. On 8/18/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > > Maybe you are right. On the other hand I like to have all in one place > (hey gilles ;-)). > > Say you want to refactor the name of one function or you want to add > another parameter. You would have to go to two files to edit. Hm, that's > exactly the same you are talking about, just another case... > > Actually I took it always for a benefit of all the addEvent functions, > that I did not need to put everything into one single init function and > be able to simply add an event without overwriting existing ones. I > think the init function is kind of legacy style from the times when > everything went into the body's onload attribute - just my 2 $. > > > -- Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
