dave.methvin wrote:
>
>> - Disabling Javascript (not CSS) should not enhance behaviour
>> but functionality AND LAYOUT (CSS) should remain at least.
>> Any suggestions on defining 'good practises' for css in plugins?
>
> A plugin should fail in a way that causes the least disruption to the
> page.
> The basic jCarousel example seems to do this. If script is off, you see
> all
> the thumbnails in the li tags, which you could style any way you like--for
> example by adding a nocarousel class to the ul tag. As part of the .ready
> code for the page you could remove the nocarousel class so that it would
> not
> affect the result when scripting was enabled. I suppose jCarousel could
> do
> that automatically as part of its initialization.
>
I agree with that. jCarousel is javascript library which provides
functionality. Responsible for the layout should be the user or designers
who create templates for jCarousel. The examples are made to illustrate the
possibilities of jCarousel rather than showing "good practises" for css.
dave.methvin wrote:
>
> The only other enhancement I can see for jCarousel itself is to
> automatically insert the next/back buttons rather than having them in the
> markup; those tradeoffs have already been discussed.
>
Its implemented in the new version.
Jan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/jCarousel-tf2205628.html#a6195795
Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
