Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
> Hi folks,
>
> which of the following examples of global ajax handlers make more sense
> and are easier to understand?
>
> $("#msg").ajaxSuccess(function(){
> $(this).append("<li>Successful Request!</li>");
> });
>
> or
>
> $.ajaxSuccess(function(){
> $("#msg").append("<li>Successful Request!</li>");
> });
>
> With chaining:
> $("#msg").ajaxStart(function(){
> $(this).show();
> }).ajaxStop(function() {
> $(this).hide();
> });
>
> or
>
> var msg = $('#msg');
> $.ajaxStart(function() {
> msg.show();
> });
> $.ajaxStop(function() {
> msg.hide();
> });
>
> Your opinion is appreciated.
>
> -- Jörn
Hi Jörn,
I like chaining most!
Although I think the following might make more sense anyway:
$.ajax({
...
stop: function() {},
start: function() {},
...
});
That way I have more control over which XHR requests are displayed.
There may be some that the user is not aware of and does not need to be
(validation, ping etc.)
-- Klaus
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
