Thats' 99% of the solution, I hope. But... appendTo replaces or adds? I
want to *remove* the old contents.

--Jacob

> I'd say the code would be like
> $("#for-el1",xml).appendTo("#el1");
>
>
> On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK here's the point: suppose I want to return in one ajax call several
>> values to be displayed in different dom elements. I'd return an XML
>> value
>> with <for-el1>...</for-el1><for-el2>...</for-el2> and so on. Then I'll
>> use
>> $("for-el1", xml) and so on to get each piece and stick it into the
>> corresponding element.
>>
>> So how would I do it? Since the xml-tree value of the elipsis is exactly
>> the dom elements I want to add, how do I replace the current contents of
>> el1 with that? I'm sure its simple but I'm missing a clue on how to :)
>>
>> --Jacob
>>
>> > yeah... but what's the point? debugging? some folks (not me) use html
>> > without trying to deal with it as xml, and just use some regexs and
>> > other methods to insert directly into the current dom (page)
>> >
>> > the beauty of the full ajax deal is to take what you need from the xml
>> > and slip it just where you want it!
>> > I've gone thru hoops to get back my html as full xml (xhtml) and
>> > played with it in the xml manner.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> OK so can it be converted back into a string somehow (w/o knowing the
>> >> structure) and inserted inside a div for generating HTML display?
>> >>
>> >> --Jacob
>> >>
>> >> > Success's parameter on an xml ajax call is not a string. it's a
>> fully
>> >> > parsed out representation of the  xml. Normally people call the
>> >> > parameter 'xml' not 'msg'.
>> >> >
>> >> > You deal with it differently... if you get pieces of the xml with
>> >> > standard jquery notation (plus you pass the xml, as in:
>> >> >
>> >> > $("somenode",xml).text() would give you the text from somenode
>> >> >
>> >> > the complete: callback gives you the whole http request so you can
>> get
>> >> > whatever you want!
>> >> >
>> >> > On 11/3/06, Olaf Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> How I can let the grabbeing xml in browser explain?
>> >> >> With the .html give me *[object XMLDocument]*
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The Function are:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> $.ajax({
>> >> >>    type: "GET",
>> >> >>    url: "url.xml",
>> >> >>    dataType: "xml",
>> >> >>    success: function(msg){
>> >> >>                 $("#content").html(msg);
>> >> >>                 }
>> >> >>    });
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Viele Grüße, Olaf
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -------------------------------
>> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> http://olaf-bosch.de
>> >> >> www.akitafreund.de
>> >> >> -------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> jQuery mailing list
>> >> >> discuss@jquery.com
>> >> >> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב   ʝǡǩȩ   ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > jQuery mailing list
>> >> > discuss@jquery.com
>> >> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> jQuery mailing list
>> >> discuss@jquery.com
>> >> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב   ʝǡǩȩ   ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > jQuery mailing list
>> > discuss@jquery.com
>> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>
>
> --
> Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב   ʝǡǩȩ   ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>



_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to