Hi Dan, > Still, I suppose if you make enough examples of everythin everyone else has > done, and then throw jQuery's own killer features, then we might get more > converts! :D > There's plenty of cool stuff out there that we should push more and more.
Yep! See, part of my concern is that it seems that the other libraries get a ton more exposure than jQuery does so when someone creates a new whiz-bang page using moo or Prototype, it gives a ton of press to those libraries even though in many cases, jQuery has had those features for some time. So I think its important to empathize, in some tangible fashion, these capabilities especially to new visitors. I think the folks at Scriptaculous have done a really good job of this with their new site. Going along your comments, I think you're right that we need to clearly delineate whats already built-in to jQuery, what can be enhanced via a plugin, and what should be added to some best practices/demo page so that we're not constantly reinventing the wheel. I would just hate for someone to come by and say, "Well, jQuery doesn't seem to have this animation capability that I saw on Ajaxian" simply because its not obvious to them from what they see on the site. Rey... _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
