[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> 3. This is assuming that javascript is enabled right? >> Yes. Although, at this date, I actually believe in forcing the user to have >> javascript on. I am making alot of assumptions. Color monitor, screen >> resolution, modern browser that understands CSS. I do believe in delighting >> 96% of the audience even at the expense of the 4%, but you have to know your >> audience and circumstances. ... [snip] > > I am SO glad to see someone else mention this. In my mind, users who do not > have Javascript enabled in this day and age fall are missing out on a LOT the > Web has to offer. And why? Most often, because someone has filled their mind > with some nonsense that Javascript is some great security risk, despite the > easily-obtainable facts to the contrary. Some people turn it off because of > pop-ups, but that's largely a non-issue with the improved blockers inherent > in browsers now.
That sounds like its the user's own fault if they don't have JavaScript. But it may not be the users decision, what about mobile devices, screen readers etc.? > This isn't to say that our sites should fail miserably if the user DOES > disabled Javascript. But to completely discount it as a tool anymore is quite > limiting, me thinks. After all, it's not as if the user has to do anything to > enjoy Javascript-enhanced experiences; there's no plugin to download, and > most (in fact, ALL the major) browsers have it enabled by default. And with > wonderful tools such as JQuery, developers have an easier time of it, too. > > My three cents. Anyone got change? :) Don't rely on JavaScript, but use it as a tool for Progressive Enhancement. -- Klaus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
