Hehe, well i won't bring up the discussion again :) I just thought it was strange that .val didn't have any "built in" logic form form elements.
I guess i could make a plugin that extends .val to suite my needs. Best regards Christian Erik Beeson wrote: > Oh no! Not again! We had a 40 response long discussion about this LAST > month. It started here: > http://www.nabble.com/%24.val%28%29-limited-in-functionality--p7351019.html > <http://www.nabble.com/%24.val%28%29-limited-in-functionality--p7351019.html> > > --Erik > > On 12/7/06, *Christian Bach* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Perhaps I'm doing something wrong, but when using .val() on check boxes > they method seems to always return 'on' disregarding the state of the > checked attribute. > > Is this correct behavior? > > The tests are made with the latest "stable" release of jQuery and > not the > svn version. > > > Best regards > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com <mailto:discuss@jquery.com> > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
