Can you not just overlay the loading animation over the top of the currently shown image/content? Just not clear the content? Would that really add that much code?
Luke Klaus Hartl wrote: > > agent2026 schrieb: >> I agree, but what bothers me about the loading more is that the entire >> Thickbox (other than the overlay) disappears while this is happening. It >> would be less disturbing if the 'ui' stayed - the border, >> margin/background, >> links/txt, etc. - and just the image changed. >> >> I like your idea for the loader too. IE7 can handle transparent PNGs, >> though I haven't tested how well. Maybe IE6 gets a loadbar instead? >> >> Adam >> >> deadguy wrote: >>> When using gallery images, the load when switching images is very >>> intrusive. A less disruptive method would place the loading spinner >>> on top of the current image until the next image is loaded (rather >>> than making the current image disappear completely). The downside is >>> IE's poor handling of transparent PNG. > > I agree that its not ideal that the box gets hidden when loading the > next image. I'll see what I can do here. Fore sure, this will add more > code. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ANNOUNCE%3A-Thickbox-Reloaded-alpha-tf3293077.html#a9247701 Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
