.hasClass() would just use .is() (or jQuery.filter) internally. Right
now we're quickly gaining filesize without even adding new features
(only dealing with bug fixes). For now, .is() will have to suit.
Another option would be to add an entry for .hasClass() in the
documentation, but in its details, point the user towards .is()
instead.
--John
On 3/4/07, Paul Bakaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely Karl -
> the is() method is wonderful, I use it quite often. But there are often more
> ways to achieve the same things, sometimes it's just a matter of taste.
> Anyway - a hasClass method would probably even save a few ms compared to
> is() in my opinion, because you don't need to parse stuff.
>
> 2007/3/4, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > Maybe .hasClass() would be helpful, but keep in mind that .is() offers
> /more/ functionalities than .hasClass() would.
> >
> >
> > For example ...
> >
> >
> > $('.class').is('#my-id')
> > $('p').is(':visible')
> > $('div').is('[a]')
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm not necessarily opposed to having .hasClass(), but I really love the
> flexibility of .is().
> >
> >
> > --Karl
> > _________________
> > Karl Swedberg
> > www.englishrules.com
> > www.learningjquery.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 4, 2007, at 10:07 AM, Sébastien Pierre wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > This is not very obvious, and I guess some people won't notice that
> > "is" offers the same functionalities as a potential "hasClass"...
> > from a "developer friendly" point of view, I think it would be better
> > to have addClass/toggleClass/hasClass rather than addClass/
> > toggleClass/is.
> >
> >
> > Just my 2c ;)
> >
> >
> > -- Sébastien
> >
> >
> > Le 07-03-02 à 13:30, John Resig a écrit :
> >
> >
> >
> > give this a try:
> >
> >
> > $(node).is(".class")
> >
> >
> > --John
> >
> >
> > On 3/2/07, Sébastien Pierre < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if somebody would be interested in a hasClass(...)
> > function for jQuery. I would definitely find it useful, and am
> > willing to contribute it.
> >
> >
> > -- Sébastien
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jQuery mailing list
> > discuss@jquery.com
> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jQuery mailing list
> > discuss@jquery.com
> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Paul Bakaus
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
