John Resig schrieb: > .hasClass() would just use .is() (or jQuery.filter) internally. Right > now we're quickly gaining filesize without even adding new features > (only dealing with bug fixes). For now, .is() will have to suit. > > Another option would be to add an entry for .hasClass() in the > documentation, but in its details, point the user towards .is() > instead. > > --John
Think about it: Even the HTML spec speaks of "the element may be said to belong to these classes". Thus it makes totally sense using is() for that. The element in question doesn't have classes, it belongs to certain ones, i.e. it *is* of these classes. -- Klaus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
