2014-04-28 14:47 GMT+02:00 L. Aaron Kaplan <[email protected]>: > > On Apr 28, 2014, at 2:28 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > > As far as I know, all Funkfeuer nodes are stationary, therefore support > for node mobility is not really that important for our community. > > > > Basically yes, all nodes are stationary. > *However* you could regard the "cell-breathing" phenomenon (which is well > known from mobile phone networks) as a sort of mobility: > the reachability of nodes varies over time (other noise is mostly the main > culprit). > Yes, you could regard that as mobility. but not as "mobile node move with high speed (e.g. 4mps)"
> > So, it does make sense to have "mobility" (a.k.a meshing in the sense of > MANETS) in community wireless networks. > It's just darn practical :) > okey. well. you're free to develop / find a routing protocol that supports it and is superior to our current one. ;) > > My 2 cents, > a. > > > Regards, Thomas K. > > > > > > 2014-04-27 17:29 GMT+02:00 BEHRANG BAREKATAIN <[email protected]>: > > Dear > > > > I need to know how FunkFeuer support node mobility in a WMN? > > Actually, it uses proactive protocol. This tye of protocols cannot > perform well in dynamic networks where mobile node move with high speed > (e.g. 4mps) in the network, because it is necessary to update routing > tables for many times. This imposes high network overhead on the network. > > > > Best Regards > > Behrang > > > > -- > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > -- > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >
-- Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.funkfeuer.at/mailman/listinfo/discuss
