Just in case anyone is watching… I thought USBA used streams -- I think USBA
1.0 actually did. USBA 2.0 appears to be far more straight-forward. I'm going
to take a serious look at seeing what it would take to add USB 3.0 -- hopefully
with only minor additions to USBA instead of the full rearchitecture I was
previously believing was necessary.
I'll keep keep the developer@ list posted on progress as I have it.
- Garrett
On Sep 29, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Garrett D'Amore <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Andrew Gabriel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>> I'm going to guess that we can probably kill off the wireless USB code… but
>>> I'm open to counter opinions.
>>>
>>
>> If you look at the Wikipedia page
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_USB#Development
>> it looks like it died in 2009 when it was transfered to the Bluetooth
>> Special Interest Group,
>> but work couldn't continue as some members would not sign up to the
>> necessary agreements
>> for the intellectual property transfer.
>
>
> Yes, from a product development standpoint, Wireless USB is definitely dead.
> I did find some references to products, but they are all discontinued. I'm
> inclined to just pitch this -- but perhaps someone actually managed to get
> this working and using it somewhere?
>
> (The work on 60GHz seems to have supplanted Wireless USB, for the record.
> Therefore, I don't see Wireless USB making a comeback.)
>
> - Garrett
>
>
-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
