On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> In that case, it obviously should be zpool create -o blocksize=...
> I'm guessing it's trying to be per-vdev.
>
> I'm completely unconvinced that integrating the current hack as a
> stop-gap is even somewhat sensible. When done properly, none of this
> UI is necessary, or even a good idea.
I disagree. Having an override option is useful when the disk drive lies, and
we don't know about it yet. We do need a grey list somewhere for these
outliers. I can also see reasons to use an even bigger block size -- think
SSDs which have different cell properties. :-)
- Garrett
>
> -- Rich
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> illumos-discuss
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/22003744-45f01c1f
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
illumos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/182180/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/182180/21175430-2e6923be
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21175430&id_secret=21175430-6a77cda4
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
